Author: LBank Research Analyst: Ludo
Disclaimer: This report is compiled and analyzed from publicly available information and is intended solely for information sharing and research discussion. It does not constitute investment advice, a securities recommendation, a trading instruction, or any guarantee of returns. The company operations, valuations, market prices, and consensus expectations discussed herein may change over time. Readers should independently verify the data and make their own decisions.
1. Core Conclusion
Overall judgment: JPMorgan Chase & Co. is a high-quality financial franchise, but the equity is moderately expensive at USD 331.43, with a cautious, mildly negative risk/reward tilt. The decisive variable is whether sustained returns on tangible common equity can exceed 21% while balance-sheet growth absorbs capital. The October 13 closing price implies 2.94x September tangible book value and 14.4x annualized third-quarter adjusted earnings. This is a substantial quality premium, requiring profitable growth rather than merely a larger balance sheet.
-
Core earnings remain strong, but operating leverage weakened. Q3 managed revenue rose 8% to USD 50.907 billion, while expenses rose 12% to USD 27.295 billion. Managed pre-provision profit increased only 3.4%, to USD 23.612 billion. Net income rose 6% and diluted EPS rose 10%, but lower credit provisions and a smaller share count helped the result. Revenue growth therefore overstates the improvement in the underlying earnings engine. The investment implication is that valuation expansion needs better cost productivity, not just sustained customer activity.
-
Deposit and lending growth are valuable, although their capital cost is rising. Average deposits grew 8% and average loans grew 10% YoY. NII excluding Markets increased 6% to approximately USD 24.7 billion. Standardized RWA increased to USD 2.184 trillion and CET1 fell to 13.9%, from 14.2% in June. Growth remains economically useful, but the incremental return on the capital supporting that growth now matters more than its volume. Capital deployment can compound shareholder value when fees and spreads compensate for credit risk and required equity.
-
The updated outlook does not provide a clean near-term profit upgrade. The presentation implies 2026 NII excluding Markets of USD 97.2 billion, versus July's approximately USD 96.5 billion, and adjusted expense of USD 108.6 billion, versus USD 107.5 billion. Total NII rises by the same USD 0.7 billion, to USD 106.2 billion. Holding other lines constant, the USD 1.1 billion expense increase exceeds the NII increase by USD 0.4 billion before tax. Management's preliminary 2027 NII excluding Markets central case of approximately USD 107 billion is encouraging, but it is not full earnings guidance.
-
The franchise premium is deserved; its current size is demanding. A steady-state tangible-book model uses justified P/TBV = (sustainable ROTCE − growth)/(cost of equity − growth). Our base assumptions of 20% ROTCE, 10% cost of equity and 4% perpetual growth imply 2.67x TBV, or approximately USD 300.37, 9.4% below the observed stock close. A weaker 18%/11%/4% case gives USD 225.28; a stronger 22%/9.5%/4% case gives USD 368.64. These are analytical sensitivities, not company forecasts or externally sourced price targets. At 2.94x TBV, the market embeds approximately 21.65% sustainable ROTCE under the base discount and growth assumptions. That exceeds the reported 20% and adjusted 21% Q3 returns. The model assumes clean-surplus accounting and a stable payout consistent with growth: 4% growth at 20% ROTCE implies 20% retention and 80% payout. This is a long-run simplification, not a forecast of the current 61% LTM payout; greater capital retention or book-value volatility can lower its applicability.
-
The institution is gaining business, but cash distributions are becoming less immediate. Q3 common dividends were USD 4.4 billion and net common repurchases only USD 664 million; management explicitly prioritized reinvestment and client support. LTM net payout was 61%, while the annualized USD 1.65 quarterly dividend yields approximately 1.99% at the observed equity price. Reduced repurchases are not proof of weaker earnings, but they remove a direct source of near-term EPS support. New investment must generate sufficient returns to justify retained capital and the premium paid for it.
The research trigger is the October 13 Q3 release, published one day before this report. The official LBank JPMON interface was retrieved through command-line HTTP, with the pair, order-book area and buy/sell controls present; the listing announcement confirms the JPMorgan entity mapping. AMDON and COSTON were also screened through opened trading pages, but their underlying companies had already been covered within 90 days. The equity price used throughout is the NYSE JPM close, not the token quote. Token ownership and the underlying company's common-stock rights should be assessed separately.
2. Company Overview, Business Mix, and Core Operating Metrics
JPMorgan earns money by combining customer funding, balance-sheet deployment and fee-based services. Retail deposits fund lending and securities; credit cards earn interest and fees; businesses pay for payments, credit and transaction services; institutional clients pay for advisory, underwriting, execution, financing and custody. Wealth customers pay management and advice fees, with lending adding another income stream. Its advantage is the ability to serve the same customer across several products, spreading technology, compliance and distribution investment over a large revenue base.
This model has several distinct economic sensitivities. Deposit income depends on the difference between asset returns and funding costs. Card growth must be evaluated after rewards, marketing, charge-offs and provisions. Institutional financing and trading require risk capital and collateral, while advice and management fees are more sensitive to client activity and market levels. Auto leasing introduces depreciation and residual-value exposure. The three operating divisions together provide diversification, although a market shock can simultaneously affect asset values, credit quality and fee demand.
|
Business
|
Q3 managed revenue, USD million
|
Q3 net income, USD million
|
Revenue mix
|
Economics and constraints
|
|
Consumer & Community Banking
|
21,171
|
5,670
|
41.6%
|
Deposit spreads, card interest, wealth fees, mortgages and auto leasing; consumer credit and acquisition costs constrain returns.
|
|
Commercial & Investment Bank
|
22,734
|
8,247
|
44.7%
|
Advisory and underwriting, payments, lending, trading and custody; client activity and capital intensity drive earnings.
|
|
Asset & Wealth Management
|
6,909
|
1,843
|
13.6%
|
Asset-based management fees, private banking and lending; market levels, inflows and advisor productivity matter.
|
|
Corporate
|
93
|
-455
|
0.2%
|
Treasury, investment securities and central functions; securities losses and interest-rate exposure create volatility.
|
Source basis: Q3 2026 earnings release and supplement, October 13. Revenue mix uses each segment's managed revenue divided by USD 50.907 billion; rounding produces a total slightly above 100%. Segment net income includes allocated taxes and capital frameworks; Corporate is a residual activity rather than a customer franchise.
Core operating metrics and changes
|
Metric / event
|
Latest evidence
|
Research implication
|
|
NII excluding Markets
|
USD 24.7 billion; +6% YoY
|
Balance growth offsets rate pressure; cleaner lending/deposit indicator than total NII.
|
|
Consumer activity
|
Card sales +10%; 650,000+ net new checking accounts
|
Customer acquisition supports funding and fee growth, but acquisition spending rises.
|
|
Markets / Investment Banking fees
|
USD 10.3 billion / USD 3.005 billion; +15% / +14%
|
Equities strength supports fees; market-dependent earnings need normalization.
|
|
Asset management
|
AUM USD 5.210 trillion; long-term inflows USD 51 billion
|
Inflows support recurring fees; rising markets also lift the reported asset base.
|
|
2026 outlook versus July
|
NII ex. Markets 97.2 vs 96.5; total NII 106.2 vs 105.5; adjusted expense 108.6 vs 107.5 (USD billions)
|
Incremental NII guidance of 0.7 is smaller than incremental expense guidance of 1.1.
|
|
2027 preliminary central case
|
NII excluding Markets approximately USD 107 billion
|
About 10.1% above 2026 implied outlook; no complete 2027 earnings guidance.
|
Source basis: Q3 presentation and supplement; July outlook from the Q2 earnings transcript. Figures described as outlook are management indications, not realized results. The 2027 case is preliminary and market dependent.
The cleanest development is that lending and deposit volumes offset some interest-rate pressure. Total managed NII grew 13%, but NII excluding Markets grew only 6%; the difference matters because Markets NII interacts with trading income and financing activity. Treating every dollar of total NII as a stable retail spread would exaggerate earnings durability. The supplement's ex-Markets net yield was 3.70%, compared with 3.65% in Q2 and 3.73% a year earlier, showing that volume growth rather than a broad YoY spread expansion carried the improvement.
The businesses also show different cost dynamics. CIB revenue grew faster than its expenses, supporting stronger segment profit. Consumer expenses outpaced revenue, while lower provisions supported net income. AWM fee growth benefited from both inflows and market levels, yet its expenses broadly matched revenue growth. Firmwide operating leverage consequently weakened despite several strong business lines. This is the central distinction between a successful franchise quarter and a compelling earnings upgrade for shareholders.
The transition from Q2 also needs normalization. Q2 included a USD 4.6 billion Visa gain and USD 1.0 billion of gains on certain equity investments. Q3 included USD 658 million of investment securities losses. Comparing reported EPS of USD 7.70 with USD 5.57 mechanically implies a 28% decline, but does not isolate recurring performance. Company-adjusted EPS moved from USD 6.14 to USD 5.75, a 6.4% decline. Adjustments are informative, although securities repositioning and investment outcomes still affect capital and should not be treated as economically irrelevant.
3. Fundamental Quality
|
Metric
|
3Q25
|
2Q26
|
3Q26
|
|
Reported revenue, USD million
|
46,427
|
57,347
|
50,172
|
|
Managed revenue, USD million
|
47,120
|
58,022
|
50,907
|
|
Noninterest expense, USD million
|
24,281
|
27,316
|
27,295
|
|
Managed pre-provision profit, USD million
|
22,839
|
30,706
|
23,612
|
|
Net income, USD million
|
14,393
|
21,155
|
15,305
|
|
GAAP diluted EPS, USD
|
5.07
|
7.70
|
5.57
|
|
ROTCE, annualized
|
20%
|
29%
|
20%
|
|
Managed overhead ratio
|
52%
|
47%
|
54%
|
|
Credit provision, USD million
|
3,403
|
2,515
|
2,743
|
|
CET1 ratio, Standardized
|
14.8%
|
14.2%
|
13.9%
|
|
Tangible book value per share, USD
|
105.70
|
113.35
|
112.64
|
|
Cash and due from banks, USD million
|
21,821
|
24,720
|
21,259
|
|
Long-term debt, USD million
|
427,203
|
460,523
|
460,160
|
|
Quarterly operating cash flow / capex
|
Not shown in earnings supplement
|
See 1H26 note below
|
Not disclosed in reviewed Q3 package
|
|
Industrial-style FCF
|
Not used
|
Not used
|
Not used
|
Source basis: Q3 supplement, with GAAP revenue and net income separated from managed non-GAAP revenue and pre-provision profit. ROTCE and TBV are non-GAAP. Latest capital ratios are estimated. Historical figures use the current supplement's comparative presentation, which supersedes preliminary values in older releases.
Growth quality is strong in customer demand and more mixed in profit conversion. Managed pre-provision profit of USD 23.612 billion divided by revenue of USD 50.907 billion gives a 46.4% margin, versus 48.5% a year earlier. The 2.1 percentage-point contraction explains why higher revenue did not translate into proportionate operating profit. Credit provisions fell by USD 660 million YoY; this supported net income, but future reductions cannot be assumed without considering loan growth and the credit cycle. In the consumer division, relatively flat charge-offs alongside lower reserve additions are different from a structural reduction in credit risk.
Capital and liquidity remain strong, but growth is consuming headroom. September period-end deposits were USD 2.781 trillion against loans of USD 1.585 trillion, a 57% loan/deposit ratio. Cash and marketable securities were approximately USD 1.5 trillion, a liquidity measure that includes eligible securities and is much broader than cash and due from banks. Long-term debt is a funding input for a regulated financial institution; deducting all debt from a conventional enterprise value would not produce a useful operating valuation. Both the quantity and the regulatory availability of liquidity matter, because resources at bank subsidiaries are not automatically distributable to the parent.
Cash conversion must be interpreted through banking accounting. The latest reviewed filed cash-flow statement covers 1H26: operating cash flow was negative USD 237.044 billion, versus negative USD 222.292 billion in 1H25. Changes in trading assets, receivables and held-for-sale loans explain major movements, with financing flows supporting the balance sheet. This is not an industrial cash-burn conclusion. The reviewed Q3 earnings package does not contain a complete cash-flow statement or a separately isolated capex measure; quarterly operating cash flow and capex therefore remain undisclosed here. We do not manufacture a Q3 FCF number. Distributable bank earnings depend on regulatory capital generation, risk-weighted growth and payout capacity, not simply operating cash flow less property spending.
The following transmission chain makes the investment requirement explicit. Assume an additional USD 100 billion of interest-earning assets excluding Markets at the observed 3.70% net yield: incremental annual NII is USD 3.70 billion. Assume expenses consume 45% of that revenue and credit costs are USD 0.50 billion. At the Q3 managed tax rate of 26.7%, incremental annual net income is (3.70 − 1.665 − 0.50) × 73.3% = USD 1.125 billion. Dividing by 2.683 billion diluted shares gives roughly USD 0.42 additional EPS; valuing this at the current 14.4x run-rate multiple implies approximately USD 6.04 per share of incremental value. This is an illustrative marginal calculation, not a forecast.
The capital side changes that result's meaning. Assuming the new assets create USD 60 billion of RWA, supporting them at 13.9% CET1 requires USD 8.34 billion of regulatory equity, producing only about 13.5% incremental net income on that capital. This is not identical to ROTCE, because regulatory capital and tangible common equity differ, but it is a useful hurdle comparison. Adding USD 1 billion of related fees, with the same expense proportion, increases incremental net income to USD 1.528 billion and the capital return to 18.3%. Profitable cross-selling is therefore crucial: balance growth alone can raise EPS while diluting the economic return supporting the current multiple.
Capital allocation deserves a constructive but disciplined interpretation. Retaining capital to serve customers may outperform repurchasing shares at nearly three times tangible book. Nevertheless, the opportunity cost is real. The reduced payout makes the shareholder return more dependent on future deployment quality. Our single most important variable is sustained ROTCE after the associated expense, credit and capital costs, rather than a headline NII growth percentage.
4. Industry and Competitive Landscape
The relevant industry spans U.S. universal banking, global capital markets and asset management. Banks compete for stable deposits, attractive lending relationships, transaction flows and client assets. Their scarce inputs are trust, customer distribution, technology capability and regulatory capital. Deposits improve funding economics; advisory relationships can lead to lending, payments and custody; wealth relationships generate both fees and funding. These connections explain why scale can protect returns, while also making execution failures or control weaknesses expensive across multiple businesses.
|
Industry position
|
Verified scale / growth
|
Competitors
|
Valuation implication
|
|
U.S. retail funding
|
Management reports #1 U.S. retail deposits for six consecutive years
|
Wells Fargo and other deposit-taking banks
|
Scale and account acquisition support lower-cost funding; share statement is management-reported.
|
|
Global investment banking
|
9.2% YTD fee wallet share; #1, Dealogic as of October 1
|
Goldman Sachs; Citigroup
|
Fee leadership creates cross-selling; wallet share differs from quarterly absolute fees.
|
|
Equities / FICC
|
Equities +49%; Fixed Income -4% YoY
|
Goldman Sachs Equities +72%; Citi Fixed Income +4%
|
JPM participates in the equities boom but trails these peers in the specified growth comparisons.
|
|
Payments and custody
|
Payments revenue +14%; securities services +14%
|
Citi Services +15%; specialist payment networks
|
Transaction and deposit franchises reinforce recurring revenue, with differing segment definitions.
|
|
Wealth and asset management
|
AUM USD 5.210 trillion; revenue +14%
|
Goldman Sachs; Citi Wealth +15%; Wells Fargo wealth
|
Scale supports fees; asset definitions and market sensitivity prevent simple share comparisons.
|
Source basis: JPMorgan Q3 release and supplement; Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Wells Fargo Q3 primary disclosures. Absolute fee revenue and wallet share use different denominators. Peer segment definitions overlap only approximately; growth comparisons do not establish market share on their own.
|
Company
|
Q3 revenue, USD million
|
YoY growth
|
Q3 net income, USD million
|
ROE / ROTCE
|
Standardized CET1
|
Efficiency / overhead
|
Operating comparison
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
|
50,172
|
8%
|
15,305
|
17% / 20%
|
13.9%
|
54% managed
|
Markets +15%; Equity Markets +49%; IB fees +14%
|
|
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
|
18,679
|
23%
|
5,294
|
18.7% / not used
|
12.4%
|
60.5% calculated
|
Equities +72%; Global Banking & Markets +32%
|
|
Citigroup Inc.
|
23,845
|
8%
|
5,245
|
10.1% / 11.5%
|
12.8%
|
58.5%
|
Services +15%; Markets +6%; Wealth +15%
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company
|
21,870
|
2%
|
5,951
|
13.8% / 16.3%
|
10.0%
|
63%
|
Average loans and deposits each +11%; expenses declined YoY
|
All companies report quarters ended September 30, 2026, released October 13. JPM revenue here is GAAP; its overhead ratio is managed. Goldman efficiency is calculated as 11,308 / 18,679 = 60.5%, a quarterly figure, not its 59.4% nine-month ratio. ROE and ROTCE are annualized and company-defined; Goldman ROE is not a ROTCE substitute. Standardized CET1 ratios are shown, with differing risk mixes and applicable requirements. These comparisons are approximate in accounting and business mix even with a common reporting period.
JPMorgan remains a net beneficiary of scale and customer activity. Its roughly 20% ROTCE is above Citi's 11.5% and Wells Fargo's 16.3%, supporting a premium rather than a uniform bank valuation. However, Goldman is the clearest winner in the specified equities growth comparison, with 72% growth against JPMorgan's 49%, and its overall revenue grew 23%. This does not prove superior risk-adjusted economics: financing growth can require more capital and a stronger market can boost both institutions simultaneously. It does show that JPMorgan's current growth is not uniquely scarce.
Citi is improving returns and delivers strong Services growth, but remains the relative profitability laggard on the reported ROTCE measure. Wells Fargo grows loans and deposits faster than JPMorgan in percentage terms and reduces expenses YoY, yet earns lower tangible-equity returns. JPMorgan is the laggard in the specific Fixed Income growth comparison: its revenue fell 4%, while Citi's increased 4%. The practical competitive conclusion is that JPMorgan wins on breadth and current return quality, while peers challenge its growth and efficiency narrative. A higher multiple must be justified by durable profitability rather than an assumption that every segment is taking share.
Demand can remain healthy without guaranteeing higher equity returns. Stronger financing, investment and trading activity expands revenue opportunities, but also raises compensation, collateral, credit exposure and RWA. Technology investment may improve service and automation, but no verified Q3 disclosure isolates an AI earnings contribution sufficient to change our model. We therefore assign no separate AI valuation premium. The bank is a beneficiary of financial activity associated with investment, with its shareholder economics still governed by spreads, costs, losses and capital.
5. Key Risks
-
Expense growth remains above revenue growth. If the 12% versus 8% gap persists, the overhead ratio rises and pre-provision margins compress. Investment and compensation then absorb growth that would otherwise support EPS and a higher justified P/TBV. Strong customer metrics alone would not offset this deterioration.
-
Rate or deposit-pricing pressure reduces core NII. If ex-Markets net yield falls materially below 3.70% without enough asset growth, deposit and lending revenue weakens. Competing for more expensive deposits can raise balances while lowering returns. Conversely, higher market rates can pressure customers and securities values; the direction of the rate move alone is insufficient to determine bank earnings.
-
Credit costs normalize upward. Card charge-offs above the indicated 2026 approximately 3.2% rate, or larger wholesale reserve builds, would reduce net income and capital generation. The 2.91% Q3 card rate does not establish a permanent loss floor. New lending cohorts can take time to season before their credit economics become visible.
-
Capital-intensive growth crowds out distributions. Further RWA expansion without matching equity generation would pressure CET1, potentially sustaining low repurchases. Retained earnings then have to earn enough to compensate shareholders for delayed payouts; higher EPS from balance growth would not by itself prove value creation.
-
Markets and asset-price support fade. An equities financing slowdown or market correction can lower trading activity, collateral values and asset-based fees simultaneously. The 49% equities growth rate and USD 5.210 trillion AUM base contain cyclical exposure, so simply extrapolating current growth would inflate earnings expectations.
-
Investment adjustments recur. Repeated securities losses or volatile investment gains could erode the usefulness of adjusted EPS as a stable run rate. Portfolio repositioning may improve future NII, but its upfront cost still affects book value and the shareholder return. A recurring adjustment should be incorporated into normalized profitability.
-
The valuation premium contracts. If sustainable ROTCE falls to 18% while the cost of equity rises to 11%, the illustrative justified multiple falls to 2.0x TBV. Our USD 225.28 sensitivity assumes unchanged book value and is not a downside limit; credit losses or accumulated valuation changes could also reduce the denominator.
6. Monitoring Checklist
These thresholds are research tests chosen for this report, not undisclosed management targets.
-
Q4 NII excluding Markets: approximately USD 25.5 billion. Meeting or exceeding the indicated level strengthens the volume-offset thesis; a material shortfall weakens it. Track net yield and funding costs alongside balances.
-
Q4 adjusted expense: approximately USD 27.5 billion. Spending above this level without a corresponding fee or NII benefit weakens expected profit conversion. Expense growth below revenue growth would improve the thesis.
-
2027 core NII case: approximately USD 107 billion. A firmer outlook near this level with controlled expenses supports upside; growth that requires disproportionate RWA or staffing would be less valuable. Monitor the full profit and capital picture when guidance becomes available.
-
ROTCE: sustain at least 21%, with improvement toward approximately 21.65%. The former supports franchise quality; the latter roughly meets the current multiple's implied steady-state requirement under our base assumptions. Repeated reported returns below 20% strengthen valuation concerns.
-
CET1 and RWA: monitor 13.9% and USD 2.184 trillion. A decline below 13.5% while RWA keeps expanding would heighten payout concerns in this research framework. The threshold is not a regulatory breach level and must be interpreted with all applicable ratios.
-
Card losses and wholesale reserves. A card loss rate materially above approximately 3.2%, or escalating wholesale reserve additions across consecutive quarters, weakens normalized earnings. Q3's wholesale-led USD 539 million firmwide reserve build is the starting point.
-
Fees and shareholder returns. Sustained double-digit payments and wealth growth alongside more balanced buybacks strengthens the capital-efficiency case. Use the November 5 BancAnalysts presentation and January 14, 2027 Q4 earnings call to test deployment returns, not just payout promises.
7. Sources
-
JPMON/USDT Spot Trading | LBank (https://www.lbank.com/trade/jpmon_usdt) — Command-line HTML retrieved October 14; pair, order-book area and buy/sell controls visible. Displayed token price was not used as an equity quote.
-
-
-
-
-
-
3Q26 Earnings Press Release (https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmc/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/investor-relations/documents/quarterly-earnings/2026/3rd-quarter/6c1f8114-1be4-4174-8292-f75bbb59bc21.pdf) — October 13, 2026; GAAP and adjusted results, segment performance and payouts.
-
3Q26 Earnings Presentation (https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmc/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/investor-relations/documents/quarterly-earnings/2026/3rd-quarter/2b5b9a7e-a968-4985-94ad-5fa949a08d1c.pdf) — October 13, 2026; outlook, capital and operating metrics.
-
3Q26 Earnings Supplement (https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmc/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/investor-relations/documents/quarterly-earnings/2026/3rd-quarter/c89c7479-82df-4c9f-a7be-957956430abd.pdf) — October 13, 2026; comparative data, balance sheet and reconciliations.
-
JPMorgan Chase & Co. Form 8-K (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000162828026065582/jpm-20261013.htm) — October 13, 2026; earnings materials furnished under Item 2.02; downloaded and reviewed through HTTP.
-
JPMorgan Chase & Co. Form 10-Q (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000162828026054343/jpm-20260630.htm) — Filed August 6, 2026; period June 30. Large SEC HTML exceeded web-reader limits; official IR PDF reviewed.
-
CORP Q2 2026 (https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmc/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/investor-relations/documents/quarterly-earnings/2026/2nd-quarter/corp-q2-2026.pdf) — Official IR copy of Form 10-Q; cash-flow analysis page 17 and consolidated statement page 97.
-
2Q26 Earnings Transcript (https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmc/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/investor-relations/documents/quarterly-earnings/2026/2nd-quarter/2Q26-earnings-transcript.pdf) — July 14, 2026; prior NII and adjusted expense outlook.
-
-
3Q26 GS Earnings Results (https://www.goldmansachs.com/pressroom/press-releases/current/pdfs/2026-q3-results.pdf) — October 13, 2026; peer revenue, earnings, business growth, expense and capital.
-
-
Exhibit 99.1 (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/72971/000007297126000318/wfc3qer10-13x26ex991xrelea.htm) — October 13, 2026; SEC Exhibit 99.1, peer performance and capital.
-
-
Transfer